Home Pianists' Reviews 1860s to 1890s 1900 through the 1920s 1930s to 1940s 1960s to 1990s About LPR Contact LPR Links
|
|
- produce the broadest range of dynamics and color
|
- are uniform in timbre and volume, note to note, throughout
their compass (particularly at a pianissimo)
|
- allow effortless, intuitive control of the sound.*
|
*Most musicians' connection to the music is
direct. For singers and wind/ brass players, the breath
produces the sound; with string players it is the hand's pull of
the bow, or the finger's pluck of the string. Pianists, however,
are disconnected from how sound is produced on the piano. Their
technique is translated through a series of levers of abstruse
relationships, each in varying degrees of adjustment and
condition. If that isn't bad enough, they can only evoke a note,
at whatever dynamic level and of any duration, with a millisecond
touch of the hammer to the string. (Remarkably, too, at the very
moment of contact, the pianist has relinquished all control of the
hammer.) And now the worst: the pianist usually performs on
someone else's instruments, and rarely are those instruments
maintained in true concert condition.
The result? Pianists are diverted from
music-making to compensation for the instrument's deficits.
Pianos renovated by Lidstrom Piano Restoration respond
intuitively and with immediacy, as if
there is no intervening mechanism between the keys and the
strings.
|
- Historically important pianos. For most
instruments, all facets of their construction are comprehensively renewed to assure the finest
cabinetry, touch
and sound. (That said, we do not blithely replace soundboards--in
our experience restored older boards outperform new ones--but change
them only when the circumstances truly warrant it.)
With 19th century, "pre-modern" instruments, true restoration--and
ongoing conservation--should be considered. This means that the
original intent, materials and methodology of the maker guide the
restoration process. The historical value of the piano overrules the
temptation to "modernize" the instrument. In the case of Steinway grands from the period between 1859 and
1885, there are serious questions to resolve. The action geometry of
the 1860s instruments, for example, is virtually modern, but the means
of attaching the action to the keyframe makes them extremely difficult
to service. Does the rebuilder solve this problem by retrofitting
Steinway's own answer to this problem, implemented just a few years
later?
Except in the case of museum instruments--those to which we refer
to learn how pianos of earlier centuries were made--the answer lies somewhere in keeping the
"expressive intent" of the instrument. "Expressive intent" is how the instrument makes
music via the string scaling, the action geometry, hammer type, etc. Functional improvements
should not compromise that
"expressive" intent, but can be made to insure durability
and serviceability. Pianos, after all, are musical instruments first,
designed to be played and serviced, and only secondarily might they
become "antiques", preserved as a link to the past.
|
-
Cost. The cost of a complete renovation typically ranges between
$32,000 and $44,000. The instrument's size and condition, the type of finish
selected, the use of iron-wrapped strings, the need for soundboard and keyboard replacement, etc., will
affect the final cost.
|
|
|
|